Legal Opinion

State v. Mattiello

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 10, 1966No. File No. CR 1-20111PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.

No finding or transcript of evidence has been filed by the defendant, nor is the appeal directed toward the finding of guilty on the second count, on which the defendant was committed to the Connecticut state farm for women concurrently with the commitment on the first count. The slim record before us yields little information on the factual background which of necessity we must consider in deciding the questions of law raised by the demurrer to the first count. After a full trial on the facts, we cannot pass on the court’s ruling on the demurrer as a disembodied proposition of law.

With such…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. State v. SulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  3. State v. ZazzaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  4. State v. MuoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  5. Cinque v. BoydSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. L. N.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. State, in the Interest of LnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. S S v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  4. S S v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  5. S S v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API