Legal Opinion

David S.W. v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 27, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents a question of statutory construction in relation to the apparently discriminatory effect of reading the provisions of the sex crimes statute in 11 Del.C. § 767(3) in conjunction with the sexual misconduct provisions in 11 Del. C. § 762.1 A literal reading of these statutes suggests that a youthful defendant who engages in sexual intercourse with a victim who is less than sixteen years old may be found guilty of second degree rape, while a defendant who is at least four years older than a young victim can be found guilty of the lesser offense of sexual misconduct. *1101We find…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In re W. E. P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Acosta v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. State v. BrothersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Downer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API