Legal Opinion

Downer v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 22, 1988PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

This appeal from the Superior Court presents the question of whether a defendant who plea bargained may seek to vacate a guilty plea to an offense which subsequently was determined not to exist. The Superior Court ruled that although the offense to which the defendant, David Downer, had pleaded guilty had been impliedly repealed prior to the entry of the plea, the resulting benefit to the defendant in avoiding prosecution for a greater offense precluded post sentencing relief. The Superi- or Court also ruled that since the facts underlying the charge constituted indictable…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. Benge v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. State v. LaboySupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  4. United States v. Lester Eugene FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API