Meadville Forging Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
Meadville Forging Company and Trans-General Services Company (collectively, Employer) appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that granted the claim petition of Christopher Hawes (Claimant).
Claimant began working for Employer on March 15, 1995, as a “C.N.C. operator.” 1 In this capacity, Claimant placed parts inside a chuck and programmed a computer to cut material needed to make parts. Claimant’s work required him to grasp and manipulate metal parts with his hands and exposed him to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Morey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Lash v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Steglik v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Joy Global, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Advance Auto Parts & Sedgwick CMS v. WCAB (Morton)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Meadville Forging Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Steglik v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000