Legal Opinion

Pennel v. Rule

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1961No. 39224PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

In 1956, Chas. W. Pennel, hereafter referred to as “testator”, died testate. In so far as pertinent to this appeal, testator provided in his will that his wife, Jennie A. Pennel, should take his household furniture and automobile; that she should take all other property as trustee; that she should *826“have the right to use all income and any part of the principal she may desire for her comfort, convenience, maintenance and pleasure and she shall not be required to account for same”; that she should have “full power to reduce my estate or any part thereof to possession and handle…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abraham v. HomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Kingkade v. PlummerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Estes v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Baird v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. North v. TiptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Ford Motor Credit Company v. GoingsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  3. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API