Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1907No. Civ. No. 399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Action to recover the amount alleged to be due from the estate of William Hartman, deceased, on a claim presented to defendant executor and disallowed ¡by him.

By the first cause of action set forth in the complaint it is alleged: That on October 2, 1903, said Hartman received from Edward Hart and Laura Hart $1,280, as the purchase price of certain described land, which then belonged to plaintiff and which had been conveyed to him by said Hartman on July 21, 1896, by grant deed of that date, and which said sum said Hartman received in trust for plaintiff to be delivered on demand; that no part…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pickens v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hays v. . HathornNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Giselman v. StarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Ruiz v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Friendly Village Community Ass'n v. Silva & Hill Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Stinchcomb v. PattesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Jackson v. McGilbraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Barber v. WiemerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API