Legal Opinion

Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. McBroom

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1884No. 11,165PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

This action was commenced in the Fountain Circuit Court and carried by change of venue to the Warren Circuit Court. The introductory clause of the assignment of errors reads thus: “The appellant says that there is manifest error in the judgment and proceedings of this cause in the circuit court of Fountain county, Indiana, in this, to wit.” The appellee stoutly contends that this statement restricts the assignment to errors committed by the court named, and that it can not be extended to rulings made by the Warren Circuit Court. Cases closely analogous are cited, and we feel bound to hold…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. State ex rel. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis R. R.Indiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. State ex rel. Childers v. DelanoIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Riley v. MurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Shaw v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Baldwin v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. WaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Romona Oölitic Stone Co. v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Holliday & Wyon Co. v. O'DonnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API