Legal Opinion
Sandip Shah v. Mary Meeker, Morgan Stanley & Co., Philip J. Purcell and Morgan Stanley, Docket No. 04-5965-Cv
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 20, 2006No. 244PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge.
Sandip Shah, lead plaintiff for a putative class of holders of publicly traded Morgan Stanley common stock, appeals from the dismissal by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Holwell, /., of his securities-fraud action against Morgan Stanley, its subsidiary Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. (collectively, “Morgan Stanley” or “the firm”), its chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Philip J. Purcell, and senior analyst and managing director of Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., Max-y Meeker. The crux of Shah’s complaint is that defendants’ conflicts of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Cooper v. ParskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Let W. Lee v. Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Research Reports Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Staehr v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System v. MBIA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. Wachovia Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In Re Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.