Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 11, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2009-1831PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.

After he criticized a new crime-prevention strategy in the Washington Post, the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department disciplined Detective William Hawkins for talking to the media without authorization. Hawkins and his union, the Fraternal Order of Police, sued. In the wake of a previous motion to dismiss, all that remains of the suit is Plaintiffs’ claim against the District of Columbia under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting that Hawkins’s discipline and MPD’s media policy violate the First Amendment. The parties have now cross-moved for summary…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Lewis v. Gov't of the D.C.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Baumann v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Breiterman v. U.S. Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  5. Deleon v. WilkieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API