Legal Opinion
Dubin v. Dubin
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pécora, J.
Plaintiff sues to recover arrears in payments which it is claimed are due under an agreement of separation executed in California in 1934. An answer has been interposed containing various defenses and counterclaims. This motion is directed toward the insufficiency of such defenses and counterclaims. The first alleged defense and counterclaim states that defendant, at the request of plaintiff, and mistakenly believing that he was obligated so to do, paid certain Federal and State income taxes of the plaintiff. This does not constitute a defense to the action. It does not tend to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southwick v. First National Bank of MemphisNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Sharkey v. . MansfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Brody v. BrodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Cookinham v. CookinhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Geller v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Peer v. PeerNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. SeizerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
- Seligman v. SeligmanNew York Supreme Court · 1958