State v. Carringer
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the infamous crime against nature and the imposition of sentence. The sole questions presented are whether the statute is unconstitutionally void and ambiguous and whether the trial court erred in sentencing the defendants. We affirm the convictions and sentences.
The defendants were charged with having committed an infamous crime against nature, a violation of I.C. § 18-6605, which provides:
“Crime against nature — Punishment.— Every person who is guilty of the infamous crime against nature, committed with mankind or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Schwartzmiller v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- State v. BushIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. IzattIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. MarekIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.