Legal Opinion

Beaudin v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1986No. Docket 85443PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Michigan Bell Telephone Company, defendant and third-party plaintiff, appeals as of right from the May 17, 1985, order of the Wayne Circuit Court granting a motion for summary disposition, MCR 2.116(C)(8), in favor of Kelly Services, Inc. third-party defendant. We affirm.

Plaintiff filed this action after she tripped over a telephone cord in the course of her employment at the Kelly Services office. Plaintiff alleged that Michigan Bell negligently installed the telephone equipment on the premises of Kelly Services.

Michigan Bell then filed a third-party complaint against Kelly Services seeking…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Michigan Chandelier Co. v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Skinner v. DME CORPORATIONMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Meadows v. Depco Equipment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Paquin v. Harnischfeger Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Wright v. WrightMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Simko v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Triple E Produce Corp. v. Mastronardi Produce, Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Mills v. White Castle System, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Johnson v. City of MenomineeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Roberts v. PinkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API