Legal Opinion
In re C.M.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 14, 1996No. Nos. 3—95—0651, 3—95—0694 consPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton
Public Act 89 — 21 (Pub. Act 89 — 21, eff. July 1, 1995) amended the Juvenile Court Act, limiting the ability of courts to name the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) custodian for certain minors. Finding that these changes did not apply, the trial courts in these consolidated cases awarded DCFS temporary custody of two minors who had been adjudicated abused, neglected or dependent. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I. FACTS
A. In re C.M.
C.M. was born on March 14,1979. On January 12,1993, his father filed a petition to have him declared a neglected minor after he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fumarolo v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Morgan v. Parents of M.M.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Granite City Division of National Steel Co. v. Illinois Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Eagan v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Board of Education v. Warren Township High School Federation of Teachers, Local 504Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Illinois-American Water Co. v. City of PeoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Ramos v. City of PeruAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- In Re AAIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Salisbury v. MajeskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Department of Children & Family Services v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.