Salisbury v. Majesky

In case No. 96 — LM—184, the plaintiff, Harold Salisbury, secured an $85,000 judgment against defendant Robert Majesky. Harold then filed case No. 01 — CH—116, seeking to collect on his prior judgment and to set aside several allegedly fraudulent transfers made by Robert to his wife, defendant Mary Lou Majesky. The trial court consolidated these cases for postjudgment collection purposes.

The defendants moved to dismiss the complaints to set aside fraudulent transfers on statute of limitations grounds. The trial court denied the defendants’ motions and ultimately ruled that some of the assets…