Dibble v. Meyer
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.
This matter is now before us upon the motion of Walter E. Meyer for leave to be substituted as party plaintiff herein in lieu of Arthur M. Dibble, now deceased, or in the alternative that he be added as a party plaintiff.
This suit was commenced on March 26, 1953, by Arthur M. Dibble, as guardian of the person and estate of Louis E. Meyer, an incompetent person, under order of the probate court, .for the purpose of annulling the marriage of said Louis E. Meyer and Florence Polen, which occurred on September 10,1952. The complaint attacks the marriage on the ground “that said Louis E. Meyer was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holton v. HoltonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Anderson, Adm. v. CloughOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re Workman's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- In Re Estate of RomanoWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re the Estate of HollingsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Husted v. HustedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Matter of Estate of DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Hunter v. CraftCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Peters v. Briggs & SonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.