Legal Opinion

Tindel v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1940No. 29272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.

In October, November, and December of 1935, the plaintiff, George K. Williams, executed to the defendant, Fred R. Tindel, two mineral deeds and a quitclaim deed, conveying all of his ll/45ths interest in 140 acres of valuable oil land. This action to vacate said conveyances is prosecuted by his sister, who was appointed guardian in April of 1938, upon his being declared incompetent. The trial court canceled the deeds, on the grounds of fraud, incompetency, and lack of consideration, and the defendant appeals. The contention is that the judgment is against the weight of the evidence.

The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Tedford v. Los Angeles Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Kendall v. EwertSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Coody v. CoodySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Byrd v. McKoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James v. UNKNOWN TRUSTEES, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API