Legal Opinion

Kendall v. Ewert

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1922No. 157PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clarke

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Appéals, dismissing an appeal from a decree by the District Court which dismissed the petition, in a suit in which it was prayed that appellee, Paul A. Ewert, should be decreed to hold in trust for George Redeagle the title to 100 acres of restricted and very valuable Indian lands, which Redeagle, a full-blood. Quapaw Indian, had, in form, deeded, in 1909, to Franklin M. Smith, w ao, a year later, conveyed the same to Ewert. It was alleged that Smith in bidding upon the land acted as the agent of Ewert who, it was averred, was legally…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Chappell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Dakota County v. GliddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Realty Acceptance Corp. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Harrison v. City National Bank of Clinton, IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1962
  4. Christian Ex Rel. Von Holt v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Begay v. AlbersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API