Legal Opinion

Guarcello v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

New Rochelle City Court

Decided March 4, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Preston S. Scher, J.

PROCEDURAL POSTURE OF THE CASE

Defendant KLM Royal Dutch Airlines moves to dismiss *413plaintiff Annamarie Guarcello’s complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 on the grounds that: (1) plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action, and (2) this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs cause of action. For the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion is, in all respects, denied.

It should be noted at the outset that motion practice is severely discouraged and generally inappropriate in small claims cases. (Weiner v Tel Aviv Car & Limousine Serv., 141…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Arrington v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Selvy v. Albany Police DepartmentAlbany City Court · 2000
  2. Loakman v. Transport Workers Union of Greater New York, Local 100Civil Court of the City of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API