Legal Opinion

State v. Melvin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 2010No. 382PA09PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Justice.

In this case we consider whether the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury that it could not convict defendant of both first-degree murder and accessory after the fact to murder. Although we conclude that the trial court should have given the instruction, defendant failed timely to object to its omission. Because we find no plain error, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

On 10 July 2007, defendant was indicted for one count of first-degree murder and one count of accessory after the fact to murder. Because no evidence suggested that defendant had…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. TurbyfillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  4. State v. HintonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. GambleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API