Legal Opinion
Ziegler v. Michigan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2004No. 03-1773PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Joseph R. Ziegler appeals pro se the final judgment for defendants in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Ziegler filed this complaint against the state of Michigan and a number of its officials and employees. He alleged six claims for relief: 1) the requirement that he give the state a DNA sample before being paroled violated his First Amendment rights; 2)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Issac Lydell Herron v. Jimmy HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Fymbo v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- James Maben v. Troy ThelenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Green v. TudorDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Gordon v. BidenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Gordon v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Adams v. ParkerDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2019
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.