Tetris Holding, LLC v. Xio Interactive, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FREDA L. WOLFSON, District Judge:
Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Tetris Holding, LLC and the Tetris Company, LLC (collectively “Tetris Holding” or “Plaintiffs”) claim that Defendant Xio Interactive, Inc. (“Xio” or “Defendant”) has infringed the copyright and trade-dress of Plaintiffs’ video game Tetris. Xio does not raise any issue of fact in response, but makes a purely legal argument that because it meticulously copied only non-protected elements, in particular the rules and functionality of the game, and not its expressive elements, that…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Silvertop Assocs., Inc. v. Kangaroo Mfg., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- Ward v. Andrews McMeel Publishing, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Granger v. Acme Abstract Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- Kid Stuff Marketing, Inc. v. Creative Consumer Concepts, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2016
- DIGITAL DREAM LABS, INC. v. LIVING TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.