People v. Wood
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Respondent was convicted of breaking and entering a flouring-mill in the night-time, with intent to commit the crime of larceny, and sentenced to imprisonment in the State prison for five years. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
' Montgomery, J.
The respondent was convicted of breaking and entering the flouring-mill of the Merrill Milling Company, about miles south of the city of Kalamazoo. The theory of the prosecution was that the offense was committed by the respondent, one Edward Coleman, and one Betts. The evidence was circumstantial, and tended to show that there were tracks of two or three *622men leading from the window of the mill to the road, where there were tracks made by a vehicle which apparently had one wheel which did not track with the others; that the imprint of the foot of the horse was rather small;…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stuart v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. McCreaMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
- People v. MacCulloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. McDonaldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. BradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.