Stuart v. People

The respondent was charged, tried, convicted and sentenced. Several errors have been assigned. Each will be considered, so far as deemed important.

■ The respondent was arrested upon a warrant issued upon a complaint sufficient in form and substance, waived *257examination, and was thereupon held for trial. A motion was made to quash the information and denied. ■ This is alleged as error.

It was insisted upon argument that even although the respondent waived an examination before the examining magistrate, yet that evidence must have been introduced by the People in order that the magistrate might…