Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 4, 2018No. A17-0965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Justice.

In this first-degree murder case, appellant Kemen Lavatos Taylor II appeals from a postconviction order that summarily denied his public-trial claim, concluding that Taylor's claim was barred by the rule announced in State v. Knaffla , 309 Minn. 246, 243 N.W.2d 737 (1976). On appeal, Taylor argues that the interests-of-justice exception to the Knaffla rule should be applied in his case, which would allow his petition for postconviction relief to be heard on its merits. Because Taylor forfeited appellate review of this argument when he failed to raise the argument before the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. Crow v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  3. Taylor v. DaytonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API