Legal Opinion

Steveson v. Frolic Footwear

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 7, 2000No. CA 99-895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAX MAX KOONCE, II, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission. Appellant sought medical benefits for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome and de Quervain’s tenosynovitis. The Commission reversed the decision of the administrative law judge and held that appellant’s injury was not compensable because she had failed to prove that her carpal tunnel syndrome was the major cause of the need for treatment and because there were no objective findings in the record to support the diagnosis of de Quervain’s tenosynovitis. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kildow v. Baldwin Piano & OrganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Lay v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crudup v. Regal Ware, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Redden v. Arkansas State Board of Law ExaminersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Freeman v. Con-Agra Frozen FoodsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API