Legal Opinion

Redden v. Arkansas State Board of Law Examiners

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 6, 2007No. 07-661PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Chief Jua decision of the State Board

Pervis Michael Redden appeals a decision of the State Board of Law Examiners that he failed to establish “good moral character” as contemplated by Rule XIII of the Arkansas Rules Governing Admission to the Bar. Redden has appealed to this court as allowed under Rule XIII(F). He seeks readmission to the bar after disbarment in 2000. We affirm and hold that the Board was not clearly erroneous.

On October 16, 2005, Redden filed an application for readmission to the Bar of Arkansas. Simultaneously, Redden sent a letter to the Board in which he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hurst v. Bar Rules Committee of the State of Ark.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  2. In Re Petition of AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. In Re Reinstatement of Law License of LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Stilley v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Maloney v. State Ex Rel. Prosecuting AttorneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hardy v. HardySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Pro-Comp Management, Inc. v. R.K. Enterprises, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. In re HaynesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. In re ShepardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Adams v. Ark. State Bd. of Law Exam'rsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API