Palmer v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for larceny of automobile: from Hancock superior court — Judge Park. February 21,' 1922..
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. A ground of a motion for a new trial, complaining of the court’s ruling upon the admissibility of specified testimony, which does not state the name of the witness whose testimony was admitted pr excluded, is too incomplete to be considered. Hunter v. State, 148 Ga. 566 (1) (97 S. E. 523); Adams v. State, 22 Ga. App. 252 (1) (95 S. E. 877), and citations. Under this ruling the 1st. 2d and 3d grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial cannot be considered.
2. Under the facts of the case the failure of the court to charge the law of confessions was not error, there being no…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Rucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Courson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Jones v. BattsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.