Legal Opinion

In re Rice & Reuben

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 18, 1930No. Nos. 17400, 17570PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, District Judge.

Objections were made to the discharge of the bankrupts on the principal ground that they had, within twelve months preceding the filing of the petition, and mth intent to hinder or defraud creditors, transferred some of their property.

The matter was referred to the referee as special master, who has sent up his findings of fact with the evidence before him and recommended that the discharge be denied on the ground of a violation by the bankrupts of section 14b(4), Bankruptcy Act’ (11 USCA § 32(b) (4), above referred to.

The case involves the disposition of an old…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bluthenthal v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. In re Julius Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  4. In re JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  5. Feder v. GoetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Willoughby v. JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. In Re GurneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. Butler Bros. v. MasorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  5. Hanover-Capital Trust Co. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API