Bluthenthal v. Jones
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. The facts, which involve the effect of a discharge under the bankruptcy act of 1898 as amended by the act of February 5, 1903, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moody
This is a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of Florida. . The plaintiffs in error were judgment creditors of Miles C. Jones, the intestate of the defendant in error. The creditors sought to enforce the judgment by a levy of execution. The question in the case is whether Jones was discharged from the debt by a discharge in bankruptcy granted to him on November 7, 1903, by the District Court for the Southern District of Florida, on proceedings which were begun on August 3, 1903. The debt was one provable in the bankruptcy proceeding and, it is conceded, would be barred by the…
2Cited by59 opinions
- Freshman v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- 27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 913, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,328 United States of America v. The City of Miami, Florida v. Fraternal Order of Police, City of Miami Lodge No. 20, Kenneth R. Harrison, President, and the Miami Police Benevolent AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Willoughby v. JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Bacon v. Buffalo Cold Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912
- Ginsberg v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.