Blair v. Cincinnati Insurance
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
{¶ 1} The Cincinnati Insurance Company (“CIC”) appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Hughie and Wanda Blair and the denial of its own motion for summary judgment. CIC contends that the Blairs are not entitled to underinsured-motorist coverage under either an automobile liability policy issued to the Blairs or a commercial general liability policy issued to a business owned by Mrs. Blair. Because the Blairs were injured while riding a motorcycle that was not listed in the policy, the “other owned auto” exclusion precludes coverage for their injuries. Nor…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Ross v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yoder v. Thorpe, 07ap-225 (11-1-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. HarlowOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Today & Tomorrow Heating & Cooling v. GreenfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Tuohy v. Taylor, 4-06-23 (7-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Towne v. Progressive Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (12-30-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.