Legal Opinion

Hinners v. Banville

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 27, 1933PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

This is an appeal from an- order dismissing an order entered on August 17th, 1932, requiring complainant, Carolina Hinners, her husband, William H. Hinners, and respondent corporation, P. L. J., Incorporated, to show cause why the decree pro confesso and the final decree entered herein should not be opened and vacated, and appellants permitted to answer the bill, and to redeem mortgaged premises sold under a writ of fieri facias issued pursuant to the directions of the final decree.

The bill prayed the foreclosure of a mortgage in the sum of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Lintott v. McCluskeyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Fox v. MillmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. Heagen v. Borough of AllendaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Howard Savings Inst.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. Atlantic City v. Civil Service Com.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  5. Reilly v. GriffithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API