Girard v. City of Kalamazoo
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Plaintiff had judgment for injuries resulting from a fall upon a defective sidewalk. It was *611a plank walk, and the testimony showed that it had been for some time in a state of decay. Both planks and stringers were decayed, and, meeting a party upon the walk, one end of a loose plank was thrown up, and plaintiff tripped upon it, and fell heavily to the walk.
Plaintiff’s daughter, who attended her, was allowed to testify as to complaints made during her suffering, but some time after the injury. This testimony was competent. Johnson v. McKee, 27 Mich. 471; Elliott v. Van Buren, 33 Id. 49;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. McKeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Laughlin v. Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Smead v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Kelley ex rel. Gibbs v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by10 opinions
- Detzur v. B. Stroh Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Larned v. VanderlindeMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Tunnicliffe v. Bay Cities Consolidated Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Pruner v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Atherton v. Village of BancroftMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.