Krispin v. May Department Stores Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Chief Judge.
Paul T. Krispin, Jr., who, along with Scott Matheis, brought claims against The May Department Stores Company (the store) under Missouri state law, appeals from the district court’s determination that the National Bank Act (NBA), 12 U.S.C. §§85 & 86, completely preempts his claims, from its adverse entry of summary judgment, and from its denial of leave to amend Krispin’s complaint to state a claim under the NBA. The store cross-appeals, arguing that the court should not have remanded several of Matheis’s claims to state court. We reverse and remand.
I
Krispin and Matheis…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Terry Wayne Sanders v. Clemco Industries, Ingersoll-Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dean Humphrey v. Sequentia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Paul T. Krispin, Jr. v. The May Department Stores Company, Scott Matheis, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The May Department Stores Company, Doing Business as Famous-Barr Co., Paul T. Krispin, Jr. v. The May Department Stores CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Michael Todd v. State of Arkansas, Arkansas State Police Department, and David D. StillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Anderson v. H&R Block, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Colorado Ex Rel. Salazar v. ACE Cash Express, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- Hancock v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.