Legal Opinion

Stine v. Greene

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the Greene Consolidated Copper Company from an -order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 17tli day of September, 1901, denying its motion to vacate or modify an order theretofore granted for its examination as a third party in attachment proceedings.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

The defendant is a non-resident of the State of New York, being a resident of the Territory of Arizona; the Greene Consolidated Copper Company is a foreign corporation created under the laws of West Virginia, whose principal office is alleged to be in the city of New York.

The plaintiff obtained an attachment in the action against the property of the defendant, and sought to make a levy by service of a copy of the warrant, with the customary notice, upon the secretary of the Greene Consolidated Copper Company in the city of New York. The sheriff also demanded of the secretary a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simpson v. . Jersey City Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Simpson v. Jersey City Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Ives v. LockwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bluebird Undergarment Corp. v. GomezCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
  2. Clinton Trust Co. v. Compania Azucarera Central Mabay S. A.New York Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Gavilanes v. MatavosianCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
  4. Michelsen v. BrushDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
  5. Raji. v. Bank Sepah-IranNew York Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API