Legal Opinion
Michelsen v. Brush
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 21, 1964No. 63 C 352PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, District Judge.
Plaintiff earlier obtained an order of attachment and had it served inter alios, on the defendant himself. Later on plaintiff obtained an order under N.Y. CPLR § 6220 to examine defendant in aid of attachment. Defendant has appeared for that examination but has refused to produce for plaintiff’s inspection the articles of his law partnership with his son, although disclosing the text of the parts of it that he considered relevant, and has refused to answer questions directed to determining (i) what personalty he owned, (ii) whether he owned an automobile, (iii) whether…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morris Plan Ind. Bank of N.Y. v. GunningNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Clinton Trust Co. v. Compania Azucarera Central Mabay S. A.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- Stine v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Bartley v. BartleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Wheat v. First National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mones v. Commercial Bank of KuwaitCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Oriental Commercial & Shipping Co. v. Rosseel, N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- U.R.C., Inc. v. Applied Images, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
- Heller Financial, Inc. v. Wall Street Imports, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1988
- Martropico Compania Naviera v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara (Pertamina)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.