Legal Opinion
Doe v. Roe
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 14, 1989No. 88-1699PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
Jane Doe appeals from the disclosure provisions of a protective order entered in her medical malpractice case against Richard Roe, M.D.
During trial, Doe's counsel notified the trial court that Doe had tested positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). See sec. 146.025(l)(b), Stats. Doe is not presently suffering from AIDS. How ever, her positive HIV test result indicates that she may acquire AIDS in the future. Based upon this revelation, the trial court granted Dr. Roe's motion for a mistrial. The order also denied Doe's motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. EnglerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Marshall-Wisconsin Co. v. Juneau Square Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Midwest Mutual Insurance v. NicolazziCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- State v. StinsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- L & W Construction Co. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Anderson v. GarberCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Aiello v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Agosto v. Trusswal Systems Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Roth v. New York Blood Center, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.