Legal Opinion

R. R. v. . Ahoskie

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On 29 May, 1890, Dr. Jesse H. Mitchell and others conveyed to Norfolk and Carolina Railway Company, a certain piece of land in the town of Ahoskie, containing one and a half acres. The deed was duly recorded on 26 June, 1890, in the register of deeds office for Hertford County, N.C. The plaintiff contends that it owns the said land described in said deed as successor in title. The deed recites: "That the said parties of the first part, in consideration of the benefit to them of the location by said company of a depot at Ahoskie, and also the reconveyance to them of the land that has been used…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Weaver v. . PittsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Green v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Elizabeth City v. . CommanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Irwin v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rushing v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. R. R v. . AhoskieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Town of AhoskieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Nicholas v. Salisbury Hardware and Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Nicholas v. Salisbury Hardware and Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API