Legal Opinion

James Clark v. Amoco Production Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1990No. 89-6075PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs James Clark and Dan Profitt, in their capacity as administrators of James R. Meadors’s estate, brought this diversity suit in federal district court against four oil companies that allegedly had extracted, without payment or permission, billions of dollars worth of oil and gas from lands in which Meadors owned a one-eighth interest. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant oil companies, concluding that the deed upon which the plaintiffs based their claim conveyed rights only to four specified tracts of land in which the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. James Clark v. Amoco Production Co., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Pickett v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Cartwright v. TruebloodTexas Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jewell Robbins v. Amoco Production CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Robbins v. HNG Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994
  3. Meador v. Oryx Energy Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2000
  4. Meadows v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1991
  5. Meadows v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API