Legal Opinion

Printup v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1956No. 19401PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Although the caveators prayed, first, that the will be not probated, they offered as a second prayer that, if probated, their choice be appointed administrator with the will annexed, and that the request of the propounder, that she be so appointed, be denied. The court of ordinary denied the first prayer, but granted the second. The question for our decision is, if the caveators should be allowed to appeal from that judgment of the ordinary. Where one prayed for a construction of a will and the court construed it, this court held that, having obtained the relief…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hardeman v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Peterson v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Johnson v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Gaither v. GaitherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
  5. First National Bank of Rome v. YanceySupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Galvan v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Cherry v. HerschCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Miller v. ScholtenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Smith v. Carlton Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API