Legal Opinion
Allen v. Kentucky Horse Racing Authority
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided May 14, 2004No. 2003-CA-000869-MRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUCKINGHAM, Judge.
Carl Allen appeals from an opinion and order of the Franklin Circuit Court affirming a decision by the Kentucky Racing Commission. 1 The KHRA decision disqualified Allen’s horse, CR Commando, as the winner of two races held in October 1998 at The Red Mile racetrack in Lexington, Kentucky. Due to the disqualification of the horse in the two races, Allen was required to return the prize money he had collected and was not allowed to share in its redistribution. We affirm the circuit court’s opinion and order.
The KHRA is an independent agency of state government and has…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Barry v. BarchiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fankhauser v. CobbKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
- Deaton v. Kentucky Horse Racing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
- Parrish v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015
- Steve Asmussen v. Iowa Racing and Gaming CommissionCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2023