Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Charlotte Harbor & Northern Railway Co. v. Welles

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 16, 1922No. 4PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

Bill in equity to declare..illegal the creation of a special road and bridge . district, designated as the Charlotte Harbor Special Road and Bridge District, in De Soto County, Florida, and to restrain the defendants in error, as and constituting the Board of County Commissioners, from paying out any funds in settlement of any supposed obligations contracted, for work done in pursuance ;of the plan proposed. And further, to enjoin the Commissioners, until, the final hearing in this cause, from contracting. any further obligations, or paying out any further moneys', on account of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Heinszen & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. LeserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Stockdale v. Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Forbes Pioneer Boat Line v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Hodges v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Lewis v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Weinberger v. Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API