New York City Suburban Water Co. v. Bissell
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Westchester county. Action by the New York City Suburban Water Company and others against Joseph B. Bissell and Joseph M. Low on an injunction bond. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.
Judgment was recovered against the defendants upon an undertaking given as security upon the issuing of an injunction in an action in which Duncan F. Cameron and another were plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs herein were defendants. The only question presented upon this appeal is whether there has been a final decision that the plaintiffs in that action were not. entitled thereto. The general term reversed the order granting the injunction, and'the order of the general term was affirmed by the court of appeals. Cameron v. Water Co., 133 N. Y. 336, 31 N. E. 104. Be*939fore the appeal from the order…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Cameron v. New York & Mount Vernon Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Steinbock v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Amberg v. KramerNew York Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by3 opinions
- Straus v. GuilhouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Clare v. GuidiNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- New York Cent. & Hudson River Railroad v. Village of HastingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896