Legal Opinion

Amberg v. Kramer

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action for an injunction by Gustav Amberg against William Kramer. From order appointing a referee to assess the damages sustained by defendant by reason of the injunction issued therein, plaintiff appeals. For former litigation, see 3 N. Y. Supp. 240, 4 N. Y. Supp. 613, 6 N. Y. Supp. 303.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

In November, 1888, the plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant for the purpose of procuring an injunction to restrain the defendant from causing to be executed a warrant issued by one of the justices of the district court of the city of New York commanding the removal of all persons and the plaintiff from the occupation of the premises known as “Nos. 46 and 48 Bowery, ” in the city of New York. He obtained a preliminary injunction, and an order to show cause, returnable on the 6th December, 18881 why the injunction should not be continued during the pendency of the action. At the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palmer v. . FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Ward's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wynkoop v. Van BeurenNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Manning v. CassidyNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Manufacturers' & Traders' Bank v. FolkNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. New York City Suburban Water Co. v. BissellNew York Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API