Legal Opinion
Disciplinary Counsel v. Skolnick.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 2018No. 2017-1735PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
*283 {¶ 1} Respondent, Howard Evan Skolnick, of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0061905, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1993.
{¶ 2} In a formal complaint filed with the Board of Professional Conduct on May 22, 2017, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Skolnick with a single violation of Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(h) (prohibiting a lawyer from engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on the lawyer's fitness to practice law) for verbally harassing his paralegal for more than two years. Based on the parties' stipulations and Skolnick's hearing testimony, the board found that…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BrickerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- Akron Bar Assn. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Lake County Bar Association v. MismasOhio Supreme Court · 2014
3Cited by8 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Horton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- Disciplinary Counsel v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 2023
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BennettOhio Supreme Court · 2023
- Dayton Bar Assn. v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2026
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BlackOhio Supreme Court · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.