Legal Opinion

Cottonwood Plaza Associates v. Nordale

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 25, 1982No. 2 CA-CIV 4150PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

The trial court denied the appellant any relief on its forcible detainer complaint against the appellee. We reverse.

The following facts are not in dispute. In June or July, 1980, the appellee rented an office in the appellant’s new development. No lease was signed. No rent was paid. The appellee was a partner in the development and they disagreed on what he owed the appellant for excess construction costs and excess capital contribution. The appellant commenced a forcible entry action against the appellee to secure possession of the leased premises. That lawsuit was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Olds Bros. Lumber Co. v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Karbelnig v. BrothwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Thompson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. King v. Petroleum Services CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. M. Karam & Sons Mercantile Co. v. SerranoArizona Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Zwick v. Lodewijk Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Giller Industries, Inc. v. Hartley, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1982
  3. Easterling v. PetersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  4. United Effort Plan Trust v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. DVM Co. v. Bricker (In Re Bricker)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API