Legal Opinion
JSK Whippany, LLC v. Township of Hanover
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 14, 2025No. 2:25-cv-11955Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JSK WHIPPANY, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-11955 (BRM) (LDW) v. OPINION TOWNSHIP OF HANOVER, Defendant. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiff JSK Whippany, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 5.) Defendant Township of Hanover (“Defendant”) opposed the motion. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff filed a Reply. (ECF No. 18.) Having reviewed and considered the parties’ submissions filed in connection with the Motion and having declined to hold oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Kusper v. PontikesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.