Legal Opinion
W. Watersheds Project v. Zinke
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided September 27, 2018No. Case No. 4:08-CV-435-BLWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
B. Lynn Winmill, Chief U.S. District Court Judge
INTRODUCTION
The Court has before it the BLM's motion to reconsider, and WWP's motions to file a supplemental complaint and to require the BLM to issue certain decisions. The motions are fully briefed and at issue. For the reasons described below, the Court will grant the BLM's motion to reconsider, deny WWP's motion to file a supplemental complaint, and grant in part WWP's motion to require the BLM to issue certain decisions.
Motion to Reconsider
In this lawsuit, WWP challenges some 600 BLM decisions to allow grazing that allegedly failed to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jerome Lasalvia and Peggy Lasalvia, Husband and Wife v. United Dairymen of Arizona, an Arizona Marketing Association Robert M. Girard and Leonard F. CheathamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Western Watersheds Project v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Great Old Broads for Wilderness v. KempthorneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Western Watersheds Project v. JewellDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2014
3Cited by2 opinions
- W. Watersheds Project v. BernhardtDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Idaho Conservation League v. U.S. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022