Legal Opinion

State v. Potello

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1913No. 2419PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fifth District; Hon. Joshua Greemuood, Judge. Pete Potello was convicted of an assault with' a deadly weapon with intent to do bodily barm. He appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

The defendant was convicted of an assault with a deadly weapon with the intent to do bodily harm. The statute (Comp. Laws 1907, sec. 4195) under which he was prosecuted is: “Every person who, with intent to do bodily harm, and without just cause or excuse, or when no considerable provocation appears, or when the circumstances show an abandoned or malignant heart, commits an assault upon the person of another, with a deadly weapon, instrument, or other thing, is punishable,” etc.

The complaint before the committing magistrate is: That the defendant at a time and place specified “did then and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. TophamUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. KeerlMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gorman v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  4. People v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State v. MeadowsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CrawfordUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. HopperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  3. United States v. CromartieUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API