Legal Opinion

Gertrude Hundley v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1959No. 13787_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, an employee of the Illinois Central Railroad Company, was a telephone operator on a switchboard at Fulton, Kentucky. Because of technological improvements, the Railroad discontinued its switchboard at that point and as a result six telephone switchboard operators, including appellant, were furloughed, and were advised that they could have their names placed on the telephone switchboard operators’ seniority roster at either Paducah, Kentucky, Louisville, Kentucky, Jackson, Tennessee, or Chicago, Illinois; and that those not desiring to avail themselves of this opportunity would…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Guy Rose v. Great Northern Railway Company, and International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers, Helpers, Roundhouse and Railway Shop LaborersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen and B. Crady Byington v. Central of Georgia Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. Ferro v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. Martin v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
  4. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1961
  5. John Ferro v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API