Legal Opinion
PUREX CORPORATION, LTD. v. General Foods Corporation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 27, 1970No. Civ. 69-965-WPGPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
WILLIAM P. GRAY, District Judge.
In this private antitrust action, brought under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, Purex Corporation, Ltd., seeks to recover for damages allegedly resulting from the 1957 acquisition of The S.O.S. Company, Inc., by defendant General Foods Corporation. That acquisition was held to violate section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18, in proceedings conducted by the Federal Trade Commission (Trade Regulation Reporter (CCH), March 28, 1966, 1}17,465). Pursuant to the Commission’s order, after affirmance by the United…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Kelly v. KosugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Calnetics Corporation and Meier-Line, Inc. v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., Calnetics Corporation v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., (Five Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Anchor Hocking Corp. v. Jacksonville Electric AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
- Narragansett Tribe of Indians v. Southern Rhode Island Land Development Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1976
- Simpson v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1976
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.